To rid the Forum of its pesky conscientious objectors, a purposely selected team was tasked with coming up with a new governance model – one which would prioritise the tribes’ financial interests in fishing and pursuit of treaty settlements over the Gulf’s many harbours.
On 20th June 2016, the ensuing Report was tabled at the regular meeting. Despite its 83 pages and the serious implications therein (or perhaps due to), Chairman John Tregidga (Mayor of Hauraki District Council) and Deputy Chair Liane Ngamane ignored due process and tried to get the Report’s recommendations accepted on the spot.
The meeting, apparently, became rather acrimonious when some expressed concern at this attempt to shove the recommendations through. Understandably, they wished to have it reviewed by their respective organisations and obtain a mandate before voting. The inevitable claims of “racism” were made.
Obstacles Simply Eliminated
There’s no suggestion that principles of democracy, good governance or working in the best interests of the entire regional population formed any part of the Report’s recommendations. They require that:
The Forum be based on co-governance, with equal numbers of mana whenua (i.e. people from the 26 tribal so-called “authorities over the land”) and others.
The tribes appoint their eight representative members via whatever methodology their leaders deem appropriate.
The other, non-tribal side of the “partnership” represent the close-on 2 million regional citizens with −
5 members (not Crown representatives) appointed by the Minister of Conservation (who would be guided by the advice of iwi-centric bureaucrats).
3 members appointed by the local authorities (Auckland Council, Waikato Regional Council and the territorial authorities collectively).
Each term would be for 3 years with the ability to reappoint as desired.
The Forum would gain statutory authority (i.e. be authorised to enact legislation over the Gulf).
This reads more like an aggressive takeover than a democratic solution focussed on what’s best for New Zealanders
cirrus wrote:Assuming all the above is correct,and it seems it is then we are seeing an asset ,marine land grab by a confederation of officials with the backing of our so called democratic -elected government. Sounds like Communism -Socialism is flourishing in N.Z. They are both the same. Communism is the taking of assets and peoples freedom at the point of a gun. Socialism is to achieve the same via the vote. |
Marligator wrote:Mowerman sadly I agree with what you are saying as I have heard this as well. Interesting times ahead for the Hauraki Gulf, and this will only be a pre-cursor for roll out throughout the whole of NZ if it goes smoothly. |
See some do do there homework first
pjc wrote:There 2 that i know of involved in the sea change group who should be standing up against this,maybe they are i have not seen any report where they have commented on. John H ,after the talk that Dr Daniel Pauly gave along with Evelyn Pinkerton has there been a follow up on what action to take against the Auckland council as far enviromental issues regarding the seabed?Remember Evelyn won the battle for a free swimming salmon in a river inB.C for the native indians. Why are local IWI being quite?? |
Snapper, cod and marlin on the menu Despite the weather we have had recently, when... Read More >
Snapper out deep in cooler water As happens at this time of the year, the... Read More >
Small snapper the norm Over the last 10 years I have noticed with great concern the... Read More >
Fishing will be exceptional when water clears The massive amount of rainfall to hit the... Read More >
New year, new action The magic 100m line off Great Barrier has been producing the... Read More >
Fantastic surfcasting As per usual, I am writing this near the deadline, and it is... Read More >