There are some really clever people involved with brilliant ideas.They all want what we all want 'ABUNDANCE" So why not get together and take the best ideas and work together on them?select those involved who they think would be most beneficial to succeed. Present a case as a collective to MPI and then return to the table with what MPI suggest and digest and work their ideas in with MPI and represent again.Must at stage get a formidable result?

Mpi surely do not want constant dumping reports and we want a sustainable inshore fisheries.

Would Mpi be more inclined to listen to body of experts(for a better word)than trying to deal with individual groups?

Not a lot of money would be involved just time(Which I think we are running out of)to a foreseeable future

not a good example but,  Nathan guy "Judge"

Recreational groups   "prosecutors

Mpi Staff      "defense"

recreational/commercial "jury"

with so many defense/prosecutors,we the jury would never reach an agreement under they way its being run now.

Am I barking up the wrong tree?thoughts!

http://fishingoutdoors.org/082016/FLASH/index.html

have a read of front page in Yellow and there appears to be banging of heads