Minister states fishery is still below target level,and he would like to build to optimum level. Perhaps he could explain what those differing terms actually mean.
So while being below target and wishing to achieve optimum level he chooses quota increase to achieve this.
So clearly less fish equates to rebuild. Dont think so.
He then talks about robust science but fails to explain exactly the details of Robust science.
All very vague.
However we are told it is the ministers decision. Is it really.?
Look at the other side,historical perspective.
Fishery fell from 23000T ,estimated,to less than 1600 T by late 1980s. Rebuild since then has been painfully slow. Virtually a whole generation has missed out.
Niwa stated genetic diversity has been lost following the overfishing in what they describe as a small isolated snapper fishery.
Commercial,or should we say Govt,or both, had their chance when they destroyed the fishery during the 1970s.. They have had their go, they goofed it, nearly destroyed the fishery in the process.
There never should have been a quota increase.
Now it should be the turn of the other 99% of fishers to have their day in the sun.