JustAnotherSpearo wrote: I think from memory their 95 option didn't pump and their 100 octane was cheaper than others 95 and the Hamilton NPD is extremely boat friendly compared to the other options along te rapa. Also just wanted to see if it made any difference which it did not. Owners manual states 91 minimum I think |
Mc Tool wrote: The thing with the 100 plus stuff is that it keeps way better so while it might cost more your not faced with feeding it thru the mower . NPD 100 plus does not contain alcohol. It takes me 4 fishing days out to burn 25l of fuel and I got sick of tipping it in the car if it ( 91 ) had been sitting for a while so for 30c more a litre I mostly get 100+.If you use enough to keep the fuel flowing , so to speak then 91 is the best value. I have had personal experience with running to lower octane in a 2 stroke outboard, melts pistons instantly .....didnt even get out of the hole ( 70 hp johnnie, bit of a storey if ya want it ) Compression ratios in 2 strokes are a bit difficult as while they may have a low static comp ratio the effective ratio goes up a lot when at peak torque as with the 2/ the incoming charge is precompressed in the crankcase and is blown thru the transfer ports into the combustion chamber , where as the (na ) 4/ has to suck the incoming charge in. 2/ motors dont like low octane ....like stale fuel and will munch a piston pretty much instantly the load come on , usually melting the edge of the piston adjacent to the ex port , sometimes just the top ring land but I have seen rings totally unsupported as the whole side of the piston has gone . Smudge , I can save you a post ..... the piston was still oily everywhere except where it had actually melted. While most modern cars will take 91 my Toyota recommends 95 and the difference in power is very noticeable if I use 91 . I think the knock sensors cut in and dial back timing and fuelling more than the actual fuel makes the difference . I did try a tank of 100+ but the only difference I could see was that it used more of it. I have a Capri ( 3.9 rover efi ) which due to a miscalculation on my part when dialling in the comp ratio clatters badly on 91 better on 96 but still had to take 4deg out of the timing and it only rattled when the boot was down . So av gas or racing fuel was the go which was a pita coz you couldnt pump it straight into the car , so when BP ultra 100 showed up at the Cromwell garage .....nirvana, then 100+ got local . Whole different car . |
smudge wrote:
Makes sense Mac |
Pcj wrote: Mctool would be good competition for "Steps" |
Mc Tool wrote: Well with all the discussion I decided to tip the boat fuel into the car ( 3 months old 91 ) and I had an epiphany ( think that's what it's called ) ,dreading the prospect of standin on one leg trying to juggle the fuel container and funnel I thinks , after way to many years "mmmmm I wonder if the snorkel of my mower fuel container would fit the boat tank" thusly avoiding afore mentioned juggle .....and it 🤬 did 🤯 😁 |
Mc Tool wrote: I think one of those battery drill powered pumps would be the go .....40 bucks get you one that pumps petrol |
Looking forward to warmer water Unfortunately, there’s not a heap to report on with only... Read More >
Good snapper out west There are good numbers of gurnard around in Evans Bay and... Read More >
Fish in good condition and trout sizes up With the opening of the trout season... Read More >
Snapper slowing progress into the Gulf The last couple of weeks have been disappointing to... Read More >