Print Page | Close Window

Scott vs Sage

Printed From: The Fishing Website
Category: Freshwater Fishing
Forum Name: Freshwater Fission
Forum Description: The place to discuss all matters related to freshwater fishing!
URL: https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=90419
Printed Date: 10 Jun 2026 at 9:25am


Topic: Scott vs Sage
Posted By: Daniel K
Subject: Scott vs Sage
Date Posted: 25 Apr 2013 at 4:59pm
Hi guys

My name is Daniel and I've been on this section quite a few times and got some great advice. 
This time I was wanting some advice with a rod selection and I was wondering if you could help me. 
This morning i took my Sage vantage out and it had broken. It's ok, it has a life time warranty. The tipp had snapped off at the eye. I'm not sure how it happened tbh. I took the rod out of its case and found it just like that. Very very odd. Maybe I put it in too harshly or something but I can't fathom it.

Any how I have been meaning to upgrade for a long time now and I am after a really good quality rod. 

I have played with the Sage One, Scott S4 and I'm looking at the Scott M series. 

Has any one who has either of the three comment on their quality and what they think about the rod? 

Thank you for your time

Dan



Replies:
Posted By: old timer
Date Posted: 25 Apr 2013 at 5:25pm
haha this could be a hot debate as everyone will have their favourite. personally I haven't used a scott but from having a wiggle in the shop they feel nice. I have a sage one that I think is awesome tho so would highly recommend that. one day hopefully I will try a scott but I don't think you will go a stray with either.


Posted By: Southern_Jez
Date Posted: 25 Apr 2013 at 6:27pm
I can see this turning into a "ford vs holden" debate ...

I have a Scott A4 ... I'm happy with it, does what I ask of it. That said, I haven't been using it as much this year, have been finding more joy in spin fishing.


Posted By: Mike.Thomas
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 6:34am
First up let me say I am a Sage manThumbs Up I have sage rods from #5 through to #9 and a sage two hander as well. They are a very good brand that stands behind there gear. My oldest sage is a 1980's vintage #6rpl, last year I sanpped the tip with a bead head nymph, totaly my fault! I took the rod to the shop, they sent it to the sage rep and a couple of weeks later I picked it up with a brand new tip, for a $50 handling fee, in my opinion that is fantastic service.
Now having said that the Scot rods I have tried are very nice. They do have a reputation in the USA as a good brand, but they do also tend to use fairly cheep cork on the handles. This is not a big deel to most, but some people get upset when they lay down a grand on a top end product and it comes with inferior fittings! I am not saying do not get the Scott, but I am saying have a close look at the cork, how much filling does it have?
I think you will be happy with both the above and I am sure the shop will let you put a line on them and have a test cast with them, (if they don't I would not buy from that shop) so you can go for the one that feels right to you.
All the best.
Mike


Posted By: Fishsnatcher
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 3:28pm
Don't think you could go wrong with either. I've cast the scott s4s and it cast nicely on the grass easy making nice tight loops. I've also had a fishing session with the sage one last weekend, I even caught a few fish on it, I think I preferred it slightly over the s4s but can't really say for sure having not had a fishing session with the scott. I'm also going to try fishing a hardy zenith this weekend which might also be worth you having a look at.


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 4:40pm
This is all great advice. Doshing out over a grand for a rod esp at my age isn't something to take lightly so thank you very much for all the feedback. I am taking it all in.  One of the primary concerns for me is not only its performance, (which is the number one factor), but also its appearance. I mean you're going to be looking at the thing all day, might as well like the look of it. 

In that respect I think that the Scott has it over the Sage (For me)
Regarding the blank technology and the overall quality (eyes, blank, cork grip, finish) I am not so sure. It would be great to compare the two blanks side by side and see how they both perform. 

Fishsnatcher - what made you like the Sage more that the Scott? 



Posted By: old timer
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 5:14pm
mate go to a hunting and fishing store they usually stock both brands although I try and by my gear from other sources but this will let you see them side by side.
im a real sage fan but one thing I would not recommend is the one elite $600 more for not much more.
also make sure you decide on the type of action rod you want first and the application you want if for before deciding that you want to spend $1000. most of the $1000 plus sages with the exception of the circa are fast actioned and this may not suit you.


Posted By: Fishsnatcher
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 7:39pm
I couldn't really say what made me prefer the one, just a 'feeling'. I'll be trying the s4 on the water soon aswell, probably end up changing my mind :P


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 8:15pm
It's a tough comparison...

First off I have to say I am a Sage pro who has been associated with and fished Sage's for about 20 years... possibly a bit more. I do like them. I also work in retail and happily sell both.

I think, on an argument level it's Ford's and Holden's and whatever is your preference is what you should go with. I am surprised the aesthetics of the Scott win favor over the Sage's as I prefer Sage cosmetically, but maybe that's my bias coming through or just that folks see all things differently..

I disagree that we can break this down into the simplicity of Scott's not being as fast as Sage's... going back through many model's of sage from the SLT, ZXL TXL and now circa Sage have produced many fuller actioned rods. Scott, has also, more recently, put their hat in the "fast game" with fast actioned rods... both manufacturers offer rods of various actions which will suit people's preferences.

Sage do have the Upspecked "Elite" as mentioned and whether it is worth $600 more than a standard "One" is a very good point on my income it would be hard to justify for the extra i get for the dollars, but this is dependant on your spending power. Scott also have an up- speced model (sorry i can;t recall the model number, we have one in the shop) Which retails well above the norm in line with the One Elite.

The Scott has done very well in NZ and held it's own well against Sage. Sage is obviously the #1 brand in the world, Scott a niche brand in the US. Both are great fishing sticks worth owning.

I work at Rotorua hunting and Fishing and we have about 10 of each brand in stock. I am more than happy to put some time aside for you to cast them side by side if you want to make the comparison that way. While I believe personally the Sage technology and design team is ahead of Scott's, what you prefer is the primary decision maker and nt better way to determine that than to put a line on each of them together.

(Oh and P.S: Modern fly rod technology has advanced to where dampening is now so advanced almost nothing can be ascertained by wiggling a rod in shop as it is not loaded... to get any indication of a rods inherent qualities it must be under some type of load.)



-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 8:49pm
I'm not saying it is an issue, but there seems to be financial issues at hardy presently.

http://www.flyforums.co.uk/news/news/6476-hardy-greys-up-for-sale.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.flyforums.co.uk/news/news/6476-hardy-greys-up-for-sale.html

This is something to bear in mind when contemplating lifetime warranties.

It would be a shame to see Hardy's disappear... an institution and symbol of quality for so very long.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: bazza
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 8:59pm
Hey Danny ....... my opinion for what it is worth & may well be wrong is that you are trying to jump the stream before you come to it.
 
What was it about the sage that you did not like that is making you think of changing brands?
 
I have been down this path several times myself & at the end of the day eventually found out the fault lay with myself rather than the rods.
 
I could go out & buy the best violin in the world but I doubt anyone would want to listen to me play it, let alone pay to do so. In my experience it is much the same situation with various reputable brands of rods
inasmuch as how do you determine if any percieved shortcomings are the result the equipment or the technique of the user .... maybe sound judgement in that regard might come with years of experience however even the regognised "gurus" are often divided in their opinion.
 
No disrespect intended Danny, but my understanding is that you are a relative newcomer to the world of flyfishing therefore perhaps trying to change brands at this stage in the hope finding a "silver bullet" may well turn into an exercise of futility until such time as you are in a position to know what it is you are after & why?
 
Asking the opinions of other members on here is also rather futile as we will all have biases & predujices which may or may not be valid personally but all the moreso if applied to yourself.
 
Seem to remember you purchased your Sage from Rod & Reel so the first step is to get it back into them asap ( or earlier ) for warranty repair & discuss any concerns you may have with Peter. In the meantme if you care to pm me it is possible we could arrange a casting session ( this weekend would be OK ) for you to try out a selection of rods including the sage vantage you have.
 
NB no way do I hold myself to be anything other than a very average caster, however I can usually recognise the faults others are making probably because I am also as guilty of doing so.


-------------
When you cry, feel pain or sadness, no one notices your sorrow .... BUT
fart just ONE time !!!!!!!!!!!


Posted By: Chris Dore
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 10:19pm
You should take a second look at the cork, mike.

You won't go wrong with either brand. Both scott and sage are top of the line brands which have been around for decades and are here to stay. Both have their own attributes and you simply need to cast a few to see which models / specs suit you personally.

I am a scott pro, as well as working for manic, but as those who know me will attest, am not one to force my personal preferences. My advice is to try different models from both companies. Whatever you choose won't let you down,


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 10:23pm
I agree with some of your points Bazza... Certainly the Sage warranty is good and the rod will be repaired.

I also agree it is far better, as a casting instructor to be able to identify faults corrects than it is to be Steve Rajeff... the FFF syllabus is based on that!

I do disagree that ability dictates the quality of gear. Good quality gear makes everything easier for everyone... sure, 99.9% of anglers cannot do what their rod is capable of, but they will do more with better quality gear than they will with lesser gear. It's the same with music... I'm no Eric Clapton, but anything I play on my Takamine sounds better than it would on any Ashton but I will never make the sounds on the takamine it is capable of producing in the right hands... but it will make anyone sound better. No a quality rod doesn't fix faults... but they will help overcome many.

The bottom line with all top of the line gear is, almost without exception, it is all good gear. There will be some that have the edge, but it is still good gear... and while you can get to where you want to go in a Morris 1000 you will get there more efficiently, with less effort and more enjoyment in a Rolls Royce and one of them will be much easier to drive.

The offer stands. I'm not on commission so it's no skin off my nose one way or another... just an offer to help if it is of help. I hope you enjoy whatever you decide on DK1991! Thumbs Up


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 10:24pm
Originally posted by Chris Dore Chris Dore wrote:

You should take a second look at the cork, mike.

You won't go wrong with either brand. Both scott and sage are top of the line brands which have been around for decades and are here to stay. Both have their own attributes and you simply need to cast a few to see which models / specs suit you personally.

I am a scott pro, as well as working for manic, but as those who know me will attest, am not one to force my personal preferences. My advice is to try different models from both companies. Whatever you choose won't let you down,


Thumbs Up

-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 26 Apr 2013 at 11:30pm
Originally posted by Chris Dore Chris Dore wrote:

You should take a second look at the cork, mike.


To be fair i haven;t noticed any issue with the cork on Scott's or Sage's at all.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 27 Apr 2013 at 8:17pm
I just noticed DK1991 you live in Tauranga... so do I. I am at Pye's Pa. I am happy to bring a few rods home from the shop and you come up and have a casting session if you wish. Let me know, just trying to help.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Mike.Thomas
Date Posted: 27 Apr 2013 at 10:08pm
Well, to be fair,  the Scott cork lately looks much better, but I do know that in the past, especially with the two handers there where lots of complaints on the US and UK forums about sub standard cork, must say I have had a look at some of the latest scott rods and they look fine to me! As I did say I am sure with rods of this standard you will not be disappointed with either one.
As an aside I know that Rene at Manic tackle is a very good bloke and he will sort you out if you did have a problem.
All the best.
Mike


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 27 Apr 2013 at 10:34pm
Fair point Mike, for a long time Rod builders really struggled to get good cork as the vintners got the first call on the best of it... In recent years, with the Stalven Cap becoming much more popular for wine bottles the rod builders have had access to much better cork for rods, what you say makes perfect sense in line with this.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2013 at 3:16pm
Thanks so much guys. 
Having pros and people who represent the brand give advice is something that I take as gold. 
I can definitely see where you are coming from Bazza and thank you for putting it in such a nice and modest way. I am new to the sport of freshwater fly fishing but I have done a little casting and what not at sea. The problems that I see for me are the getting the right techniques down and having a good platform to base my techniques on. I will endeavour to do this with Peter Scott or Yoshi at RodandReel sometime at a later date. 

I too agree with what Clark Reid said about the gear.
 "A quality rod doesn't fix faults... but they will help overcome many." which is why i am trying for the top brands now. I am looking for this rod to last me quite some time. Thank you Clark and Bazza for your offers. Unfortunately I am in Auckland now with University starting tomorrow so I can't see the rods in Pyes Pa but thank you very much for your offer, and thank you Bazza for your generous offer and for putting everything in a way that i can easily understand it. 

I will try both rods out, casting and perhaps under some load (probably by a person) and see which i prefer. I will update as soon as i make my purchase. As for now I am making some flies. Great hobby it is. Thank you very much guys. I really do appreciate all the advice. Some times one might forget about asking about certain things or about certain materials and having people remind you of those things and what to look out for is pure gold. Thank you very much. 




Posted By: flyfisher
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2013 at 3:33pm
Also don't let price dictate how good a rod is, I love Sage, and yes receive a few goodies from them, but they are solid and the backup in NZ from Don Fraser is second to none.

I use a few of the 'mid-range' VXP models ($799?) almost exclusively after a hate / hate affair with the Z-Axis series and find them absolutely fantastic, much preferring them over the flagship models like the 'One' and if you are relatively 'new' to the sport they are very easy casting rods IMO, as a lot of the guys I guided found out, just ask anyone about how good the old XP series was. 

This also leaves so extra coin for a nice Lamson for example a decent line and all the other money-sucking guff you'll come to need!


-------------
https://www.youtube.com/user/troutboynz


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2013 at 4:24pm
Excellent advice Andrew, there is nothing from bottom to top in the Sage range i wouldn't fish with either.

Danny, best of luck with whatever you choose, so long as you enjoy it and continue to evolve it will be the right choice... Thumbs Up


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Jaapie
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2013 at 5:04pm
Originally posted by Mike.Thomas Mike.Thomas wrote:

As an aside I know that Rene at Manic tackle is a very good bloke and he will sort you out if you did have a problem.
 
I must second this!
 
I had an issue with another product from Manic Tackle and it was sorted out quick smart.
Rene went out of his way to fix it, so in all honesty, credit where credit is due!
 
You have to support a bloke that believes in his product.
 
Top effortThumbs Up


-------------
"Only when the last tree has died, the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught,will we realize that we cannot eat money" - 19th Century Indian Creed


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 28 Apr 2013 at 5:42pm
Originally posted by Jaapie Jaapie wrote:

Originally posted by Mike.Thomas Mike.Thomas wrote:

As an aside I know that Rene at Manic tackle is a very good bloke and he will sort you out if you did have a problem.
 
I must second this!
 
I had an issue with another product from Manic Tackle and it was sorted out quick smart.
Rene went out of his way to fix it, so in all honesty, credit where credit is due!
 
You have to support a bloke that believes in his product.
 
Top effortThumbs Up


I have seen Rene put to rights things he was not obliged to do... he does service his products extremely well... I do not think there is an issue between either brand on servicing... you WILL BE  looked after.. seriously... it comes down to which you prefer.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Rainbow
Date Posted: 29 Apr 2013 at 2:11pm
Good rods come in different actions to not only suit different fishing applications but also different casting styles.    Casting styles become very ingrained and are very difficult to change.    I would recommend that you hire a good casting instructor for an hour before buying a rod.    He can quickly identify your style and advise you on the most suitable rod action for your style (as well as pointing out a casting fault or two you did not know you had).   
 
Rainbow


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 29 Apr 2013 at 6:34pm
Sound advice...


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 29 Apr 2013 at 10:13pm
Ah genius. Thank you for that mate. I've got in contact with Rodandreel and I have requested a lesson. A good investment I think. Thank you Rainbow


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 02 May 2013 at 11:45pm
In terms of feel what are some things that you should look out for when 'loading' a good quality rod? 
I prefer medium-fast action to straight and hard fast but other than that, what are something I should look out for? I went in to Rod and Reel again today and had a look at the Scott M. In one word the rod is ART. 


Posted By: old timer
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 6:48am
we cant really tell you what to look for
as you have said you prefer medium action, then decide on the weight rod you are after then get into it.
if you not 100% happy with your choice (but im sure you will be) it just gives youan excuse to go out and get more!!!!!!


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 7:33am
I agree, on the level of rod you are looking at they will all be great casting tools capable of doing exactly what you want. The one you "like" the most will be the best one for you... Simple as that!


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: skunk'd_again
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 7:40am
Haha old timer.... sound like a right gear whore. I guess you have an epic stable of rods.

I'm a complete rookie compared to some who have offered up advice or insight on this, but I'll throw in my 2 cents even though it's kind of stating the obvious. The thing I have learnt and come to realise this season after buying a few rods in the off season is that I should have thought more about the distance I usually cast and the size of the fish I usually target. The 4 weight I bought seldom gets used because I feel I can't dominate larger fish with it (I guess the pros can but for me I find I can't), and my 6 weight broomstick isn't practical for casting the short to medium distances I usually cast (unless fishing larger flies or if it's really windy).

Btw I haven't fished or cast any Scott rods, but all my rods are Sage and I haven't got anything bad to say about them.


Posted By: Bigfishbob
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 10:39am
I have a Kilwell presentation rod and I can cast ok with it, not great but good enough to get me into trouble. A friend of mine casts very well with any rod and can cast 3 times as far with my rod than I can.
 
I used a Sage early last year and the thing that impressed me the most about it was the power in the tip, lifting the line off the water loaded the tip nicely as it should, but a gentle flick would shoot the line amazingly well. Changed my views on what to look for in a Rod and also made me appreciate would I could get from a high end rod.
 
But still seeing my friend cast my own rod so much better than I could made me realise that the Rod really wasn't the issue.


-------------
www.waikatosportfishing.co.nz


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 12:44pm
Hey Skunk'd

Where abouts do you fish that the 6 weight is too much? 
I was wanting an all rounder North Island rod so I thought that a 6 weight would be ideal. 
Looking at fishing the Ngongotaha, Ohinemuri, Rangitaiki, and even trying the Tongaririo as my main go to rivers.  Obviously each river, stream or pool is different but the first three would arguably prefer a 5 weight, but because of the Tongariro and any small ocean fish I might want to have a cast at I'm liking the 6. Also larger fly size and wind factors in my 6 weight decision. 

Does that sound about right? 


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 1:31pm
Originally posted by Dk1991 Dk1991 wrote:

Hey Skunk'd

Where abouts do you fish that the 6 weight is too much? 
I was wanting an all rounder North Island rod so I thought that a 6 weight would be ideal. 
Looking at fishing the Ngongotaha, Ohinemuri, Rangitaiki, and even trying the Tongaririo as my main go to rivers.  Obviously each river, stream or pool is different but the first three would arguably prefer a 5 weight, but because of the Tongariro and any small ocean fish I might want to have a cast at I'm liking the 6. Also larger fly size and wind factors in my 6 weight decision. 

Does that sound about right? 

Sounds like sound logic to me.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: skunk'd_again
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 1:34pm
Hey mate....

I mainly fish small to medium size rivers, and most of the fish I catch I'd cast between 20-50ft. The 6 weight I have is a TCX, ultra fast action so I find it harder to load the rod when casting shorter distances, unless I have a mouse fly or big streamer on. I tend to fish my 6 weight Vantage more cos it loads better at short range, and it's more effortless to fish with. How did you like yours btw? I think the ideal rod for me is in between these two, I'd love to find a Z axis but I think I'd be very lucky to be able to hunt one down, or maybe a ZXL but I haven't cast one of those yet.

Btw listen to Clark Reid over anything I say, he is legend, I am rookie.


Posted By: Snap T
Date Posted: 03 May 2013 at 2:08pm
Originally posted by Clark Reid Clark Reid wrote:

....The one you "like" the most will be the best one for you... Simple as that!

He sums it up perfectly there.


Posted By: old timer
Date Posted: 04 May 2013 at 12:52pm
Originally posted by skunk'd_again skunk'd_again wrote:

Haha old timer.... sound like a right gear whore. I guess you have an epic stable of rods.

na not really at all tho I probably would if I could afford more
just two sages a 7 and a 9 and the airflow brookie for small tight streams


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 04 May 2013 at 6:11pm
Originally posted by skunk'd_again skunk'd_again wrote:



Btw listen to Clark Reid over anything I say, he is legend, I am rookie.

Everyones' opinion, if based on their experience has merit mate.... what someone likes is what they like whether they started yesterday or in 1935! Embarrassed


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 04 May 2013 at 11:51pm
Cheers Clark and everyone for all the fantastic advice. I've decided to get a 4 weight Sage One with the Scott M series 6 weight. Bye bye saving, bye bye laser eye surgery. My logic is that with a 4 weight and the fast action and accuracy of the Sage, I can fish small areas, with good presentation whilst also retaining that enjoyment "holy crap I'm gonna lose her!" factor that comes with such a light rod. The 6 weight Scott will be used for most other things for instance when wet flies, streamers, wind and so forth are factors to consider. I'll most likely take both rods on my outing and choose which one according to what the conditions are like. I will post up pics and inform you guys when i get them. I really can't wait. Thank you all so much again. This forum and the people on it are bloody fantastic. 


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 05 May 2013 at 8:14am
Now I'm jealous.. that's a serious nice set of rods...

I think your logic is pretty solid and you've taken a sensible approach!

Most freshwater focused anglers can do with a bruch up on fish fighting skills, especially with light gear... I didn;t realise this myself, even after 35 years of freshwater flyfishing and guiding, until I started to dabble in saltwater and had my own skills upgraded by Aussie Master Peter Morse.

You can land some very good fish in short order if you have your skills up to scratch. Same offer stands if you ever are down this way and want to catch up for a crash course in fish fighting using the lighter rod...

In a fit of madness one day Simon Runting and I headed out after some big Oceanic Kahawai using #4 XP's... interesting to say the least.



-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 18 May 2013 at 8:04pm
So went to Rod and Reel today to pick up my rod. My budget prevailed and i could only get the Scott. 
She'll do FOR NOW Wink Next will be the sage one in 4weight. 

Again thank you to everyone who helped me out. All the truly advice helped and I'm very grateful that I got such a wide response from novices to pros. A special thank you to Clark Reid, Snap T and Old Timer. 

I can't get my ****ty phone camera to do the rod justice but here are some pics any how. 






Cheers
Dan


Posted By: Chris Dore
Date Posted: 18 May 2013 at 8:30pm
Sexy rod.


Posted By: old timer
Date Posted: 18 May 2013 at 9:08pm
haha all that advice and you still bought the wrong one!!! haha kidding , nice one mate she looks sweet.
sweet looking case too!!!


Posted By: Chris Dore
Date Posted: 18 May 2013 at 10:13pm
Maybe thd other ONE could have been the wrong ONE for him?


Posted By: Daniel K
Date Posted: 18 May 2013 at 10:25pm
Ahahaha oldtimer! 
Just you wait mate, I'll be posting some good reports in the future with this beauty.


Posted By: Jaapie
Date Posted: 18 May 2013 at 10:39pm
Well done mate-
 
Hope you have many hours good fishing with this little beauty.
 
Just watch those tungsten bead heads on the forward strokeBig smile
 


-------------
"Only when the last tree has died, the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught,will we realize that we cannot eat money" - 19th Century Indian Creed


Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 19 May 2013 at 8:08am
They are nice rods, you'll have a lot of fun with it I am certain.


-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Simon Chu
Date Posted: 24 May 2013 at 9:05pm
Haha
Been offline

Longtime lurker first time poster

Didn't miss a thing!



Posted By: Pole Dancer
Date Posted: 25 May 2013 at 6:02am
I seem to recall a poster from way back with a very similar posting style... I believe his name was Kiwitroutbum.Thumbs Up




-------------
http://www.clarkreid.co.nz" rel="nofollow - www.clarkreid.co.nz    FFF Certified Casting Instructor / Umpqua Designer Tier


Posted By: Simon Chu
Date Posted: 26 May 2013 at 1:50pm
Originally posted by Clark Reid Clark Reid wrote:

I seem to recall a poster from way with a very similar posting style... I believe his name was Kiwitroutbum.Thumbs Up



Smile



Print Page | Close Window