Print Page | Close Window

Successful management of a fishery

Printed From: The Fishing Website
Category: General Forums
Forum Name: Fisheries Management
Forum Description: Anything to do with fisheries management here please
URL: https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=118227
Printed Date: 26 Jan 2026 at 2:46pm


Topic: Successful management of a fishery
Posted By: Southern_Jez
Subject: Successful management of a fishery
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 2:10pm
http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/78361888/Southern-crayfish-industry-adopt-new-management-strategy" rel="nofollow - http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/78361888/Southern-crayfish-industry-adopt-new-management-strategy

I know this may not be a popular topic, but given all the doom and gloom regarding our fisheries management I feel it is only fair that we celebrate and commend those who helped rebuild a fishery from the verge of collapse to the point where they can consider the economical management of that fishery. Commercial cray season starts down here in about 3 weeks.

As someone who actually fishes in this area I can vouch the diving for crayfish has never been so good (managed to get our rec limits the last couple of trips out).

There are several obvious factors that are quite unique to this area. The remoteness of Fiordland and Stewart Island give them natural protection from poaching, the weather and ocean conditions also lower the intensity of the fishing (ie, they cant fish 14 hours a day 7 days a week), and we also dont have the population fishing this area across all fishing sectors as we do elsewhere in the country. 

The main factor allowing the rebuild of the crayfish down here is the market want the smaller crayfish allowing the fishermen to throw back the large breeding crays (high biological value, low economical value).

So hats off to New Zealands largest crayfishing fleet, and heres hoping they can expand these learnings across the rest of the country. ClapThumbs Up



Replies:
Posted By: Barrie
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 2:19pm
yea they volunteered to limit their take a few years back didnt they.
well done to them



Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 2:38pm
No no no, that can't be right!
Actually, it is. As you say, well done them.

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.


Posted By: PriceofFish
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 3:06pm
Kia Ora mates,

How much is a tonne of Crayfish quota in Fiordland/Stewart Island/Southland area?Hug


Posted By: Southern_Jez
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 4:20pm
My uncle sold his 10T quota for about $6million, which is 12.5% on return at average prices. That is the price he got 3 years ago when his health started failing him, you could probably get a lot more for quota now.


Posted By: Tagit
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 6:32pm
Whilst that is a great result, it has one horribly common starting point. The action began when the fishery was on the point of collapse. Our commercial fleet will promote sustainability actions, but only it seems when they see their livelihoods disappearing if no action is taken. Pretty much all our deep water species have been through the same collapse first and then try to rebuild process. Why do we always have to wait for the fishery to be at the point of no return before we get sensible action, and why is the first action always to cut the recreational limits?
I applaud the result that has been achieved in the Southern crayfish fishery, but we need to be much better than that as we try to rebuild all the other massively depleted stocks. Waiting till each stock is on the verge of extinction is a bloody silly way to go about things, even for the people fishing it commercially.


Posted By: cirrus
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 7:02pm
Accurate perception Tagit. Wonder why MPI didnt notice it was at that low ebb. Good on the fishermen for dealing with their situation and protecting their lively hood.
And returning the big breeders seems to have worked wonders,and dispels the myth that the big older crays or fish dont contribute as much recruitment as younger fish.
Those big breeders contribute much more than given credit for,and also pass on the strong stock genes




Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 07 Jul 2016 at 9:10pm
Absolutely agree there Tagit, you really do have to wonder just why it has to collapse so badly before sanity takes hold. I would suspect that it is largely as cray quota is largely in private hands, whereas quota held in the big corporate control is regarded as a much more blood thirsty, results at all costs maximum yield proposition, the idea of accepting reductions impacting profit margins etc is just simply not an option to the desk jockeys and accountants. Oh, and of course, the lawyers.
So maybe some success stories like the southern cray thing will open some eyes.
6% of original snapper biomass in the BoP.....you'd almost think they'd start to notice that too, huh?

-------------
It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.

Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.



Print Page | Close Window