our rivers not swimmable,
Printed From: The Fishing Website
Category: General Forums
Forum Name: Fisheries Management
Forum Description: Anything to do with fisheries management here please
URL: https://www.fishing.net.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=117815
Printed Date: 17 Jun 2026 at 9:39am
Topic: our rivers not swimmable,
Posted By: Lethal
Subject: our rivers not swimmable,
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 1:33am
if you have a problem with the way our rivers are getting polluted how about putting your name to this petition.
http://rivers.greens.org.nz/?recruiter_id=2695791" rel="nofollow - http://rivers.greens.org.nz/?recruiter_id=2695791
its really a no brainer not to sign. don't we want our rivers to be none Toxic / unpolluted / swimmable were has our Green clean image of NZ gone? this Government has slowly let our rivers turn into unswimmable rivers, lets tell them this is not the NZers way.


here is another post about 10 rivers they are targeting.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11651056" rel="nofollow - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11651056
|
Replies:
Posted By: pjc
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 2:45am
done,as Dr Nick Smith reckons too late,b/s he just wants to do nothing to upset industry
------------- Sex at 58.Lucky I live at 56
|
Posted By: brmbrm
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 5:58am
|
Done, but you're wrong Eric: they are certainly swimmable, I see cows swimming in them all the time.
|
Posted By: Barrie
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 6:48am
cows have summ in them for years, this from seeing them over the last 60 years from when I use to travel with my grand father who was a vet. Most farmers I know are and have been fencing off and planting the areas near the rivers edges so improvement is already happening.
I guess that if we (as tax payers) employed people and paid for it, this planting would happen a lot faster as I would imagine that its not a cheap matter to do all this in the next few years.
Problem comes to money dosnt it and it either means increasing taxes of reducing the areas that our tax goes to now.
Personally, I cant wait for the greens to become government as NZ will become a communist state where we get a small grant from the government to live on and the government gets the rest. Retired people will have to be looked after by their children as there will be no pensions. Just look at what both labour and the greens are saying they are going to do and ask yourself where the money is going to come from?
Yes I want clean rivers and oceans but as with all things there is only so many places that our taxes can be spent on at the same time.
|
Posted By: ramprage
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 7:03am
Remember that the tree planting are sometimes paid from your rates
------------- When the going gets tough...the tough
keep going
|
Posted By: Raging Bull
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 7:46am
|
Have to agree with the greens on this one, disgusting what has happened to our rivers. If the processes/people damaging our rivers cant afford to pay to prevent damage then they shouldn't be allowed do what ever it is that is causing damage. When I was a kid growing up in the South Island we were surrounded by sheep farms with low numbers of sheep to the acre. The rivers were pretty clean, not only did we swim in them but also drank the water. The sheep farms have been replaced with massive dairy farms, all pumping water out of the rivers for irrigation to support the high stock numbers. Not only are they pumping the water out, all the crap is now flowing back in.
|
Posted By: o Neill
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 8:19am
Money still goes to Key's cycle trails pet project. Tree planting would be a cheaper option per kilometre of river bank and who wants to cycle beside some of these polluted waterways? Putting money into a declining dairy industry while tourism grows is just dumb! .
|
Posted By: Potty
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 10:20am
o Neill wrote:
Money still goes to Key's cycle trails pet project. Tree planting would be a cheaper option per kilometre of river bank and who wants to cycle beside some of these polluted waterways? Putting money into a declining dairy industry while tourism grows is just dumb! . |
 dumb? what $ are you talking about o Neil, I haven't seen any $ coming my way. It's strange that the Avon wasn't mentioned in Canterbury, that would have to be the worst down there. As for the Waikato river 7% of the nutrient load is from urban, I personally wouldn't be swimming directly down stream from that discharge. We humans eat nutrient rich food and excrete nutrient rich material, this doesn't miraculously disappear at the treatment stations as many urban dwellers believe. Dairy's major problem has been the conversions, especially the pine trees to grass ones. On a per hectare basis nutrient losses from dairy are much lower than market gardening and would be significantly lower than urban.
------------- Love fishing, love my job. It's a bloody shame that they clash. http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: 3rnzir
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 10:22am
Sure rivers can be cleaned up. Plenty of examples in Nth America and Europestan. Takes time and $$$ but can be done all the same. Those cities and towns dumping effluent into these rivers need to get their act together too. If trout can`t live in the water,then the water is no good(as in a type of mine canary). Be good work for low level prisoners to do perhaps.
------------- Peace.Via superior firepower..
|
Posted By: Capt Asparagus
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 10:49am
The tarawera eh, the Black Drain.....poisoned by the years of the big paper mill pumping its crap, heavy metals etc into the river.
------------- It is only my overwhelming natural humility that mars my perfection.
Captain Asparagus, Superhero, Adventurer.
|
Posted By: petethemeat
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 11:15am
3rnzir wrote:
Sure rivers can be cleaned up. Plenty of examples in Nth America and Europestan. Takes time and $$$ but can be done all the same. Those cities and towns dumping effluent into these rivers need to get their act together too. If trout can`t live in the water,then the water is no good(as in a type of mine canary). Be good work for low level prisoners to do perhaps.
|
Great! We can tick the Waikato off as clean because there's plenty of trout in there.
-------------
|
Posted By: o Neill
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 11:23am
If the Selwyn has no water in it that must be worse than the Avon surely? Tourism here needs a clean environment. Simple really. Tourism creates more jobs, (both directly and indirectly) simple really, creates more infrastructure and a reliable consistent income compared to dairy as over supply creates low prices and a polluted environment, simple really.
|
Posted By: letsgetem
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 12:08pm
|
I don't think planting beside river banks, has or will make any significant improvement to water quality. Its just an idea that is an excuse for not doing anything harder and more effective. If we have a lot of dairy farming, there will be pollution downstream. Dairy farming has been allowed virtually everywhere. There should be government policy to encourage more forest planting, instead of more dairy. That would win on two counts - reverse our high carbon emissions - and reduce pollution of waterways. What would you rather see - land covered in pine trees, or green fields with dairy cows. I think the farms look better than the forest; but, the other advantage of forest, outweighs the negatives. Unfortunately, the present government is very much "hands off"; liking the free-market; so don't expect any enlightened policies from them. The only way to achieve anything worthwhile, is to change government.
|
Posted By: Kevin.S
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 12:26pm
|
I'll admit that in the past I've been guilty of considering the greens to be a bunch of weirdy beardies and ageing hippies, with loony policies. But I have to wonder who are the bigger fools, people who want to preserve our beautiful country or those who would happily destroy it for a quick profit. I wonder how much good the dairy boom has really done for NZ. Environmental problems that may take decades to sort out, if they ever are, for short term profit for a few people, who won't ever pay to sort out the mess they leave.
Maybe it's because I'm getting older and my kids are growing up into adults, that I start to wonder what we're leaving for them and in the future their children. In an ideal world each generation would leave the world in better shape than they found it for their kids, but I'm pretty sure isn't happening.
I used to think greens getting any kind of power would be a terrible thing, but now I'm starting to wonder if actually it might be a good thing.
|
Posted By: Potty
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 1:16pm
o Neill wrote:
If the Selwyn has no water in it that must be worse than the Avon surely? Tourism here needs a clean environment. Simple really. Tourism creates more jobs, (both directly and indirectly) simple really, creates more infrastructure and a reliable consistent income compared to dairy as over supply creates low prices and a polluted environment, simple really.
|
o Neil I used to swim & fish in the Selwyn as a kid, irrigation is to blame not dairy farming. Without irrigation there would be very little intensive farming in Canterbury. What drives the viability of irrigation/farming? The need for urban dwellers to have food. Is the footprint of that solely to blame on the farmer? or is it every humans responsibility? Just think the next time you switch a light or the TV, the dams that generate that power are negatively impacting on water quality. What would the water quality of the Waikato be like without dams? I agree with you that tourism is going great for NZ at present, unfortunately some of those tourists don't have a lot of respect for our environment. The latest edition of Reel Life has some examples of this.
------------- Love fishing, love my job. It's a bloody shame that they clash. http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Potty
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 1:27pm
letsgetem wrote:
I don't think planting beside river banks, has or will make any significant improvement to water quality. |
Letsgetem, this comment shows a lack of knowledge on your part. The benefit of riparian planting is that it provides a buffer strip to catch sediment/soil runoff. This also reduces Phosphate (which is attached to the soil) and e-coli reaching the waterways. Monitored results are showing the benefit of this already.
------------- Love fishing, love my job. It's a bloody shame that they clash. http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: mmmWord
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 1:43pm
Potty wrote:
letsgetem wrote:
I don't think planting beside river banks, has or will make any significant improvement to water quality. |
Letsgetem, this comment shows a lack of knowledge on your part. The benefit of riparian planting is that it provides a buffer strip to catch sediment/soil runoff. This also reduces Phosphate (which is attached to the soil) and e-coli reaching the waterways. Monitored results are showing the benefit of this already. |
Riparian buffers are certainly better than nothing, and help keep some stuff (sediment etc) out of the water. They are also really important geomorphically, and help to slow down floodwaters etc.
Unfortunately, however, they don't stop everything getting to the water: a lot of pollution (eg Nitrogen) can get into the rivers via groundwater so is more a function of how many cows there are in a catchment than how close they get to the river.
This, of course, doesn't mean we shouldn't fence waterways, it just means it's not a sufficient solution in itself. Storage in groundwater also means that it might get worse before it gets better, and that even if we stopped farming entirely now it would take years for the rivers to recover (again, not a reason to carry on as we are).
Source: http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/researchpubs/Howard_williams_2013_Diffuse_pollution_and_freshwater_degradation.pdf" rel="nofollow - https://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/publications/researchpubs/Howard_williams_2013_Diffuse_pollution_and_freshwater_degradation.pdf
|
Posted By: o Neill
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 2:26pm
So is this not where the Selwyn's water has gone?
|
Posted By: Potty
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 6:02pm
o Neill wrote:
So is this not where the Selwyn's water has gone?
 |
Irrigation made dairying feasible, to cover the cost of irrigation farmers need to utilise the most profitable lawnmowers. Other alternatives such as sheep, beef and arable farming under irrigation will have a higher footprint. Higher pasture growth supports higher stocking rates. The problem created from this is being taken seriously with significant $ being spent on farm and on research to reduce the impact. PM me if you want some links.
------------- Love fishing, love my job. It's a bloody shame that they clash. http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: v8-coupe
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 7:08pm
Potty wrote:
o Neill wrote:
So is this not where the Selwyn's water has gone?
 |
Irrigation made dairying feasible, to cover the cost of irrigation farmers need to utilise the most profitable lawnmowers. Other alternatives such as sheep, beef and arable farming under irrigation will have a higher footprint. Higher pasture growth supports higher stocking rates. The problem created from this is being taken seriously with significant $ being spent on farm and on research to reduce the impact. PM me if you want some links. |
So why can we not build a pipe/pump line from the aquafers that overseas companies are making millions from instead of sending it overseas. The same aquafers that the Government tells us is water just wasted while flowing to the sea.
------------- Legasea Legend Member
|
Posted By: Potty
Date Posted: 06 Jun 2016 at 7:54pm
v8-coupe wrote:
So why can we not build a pipe/pump line from the aquafers that overseas companies are making millions from instead of sending it overseas. The same aquafers that the Government tells us is water just wasted while flowing to the sea. |
 great question, seems to be different rules in this country depending on the size of the client.
------------- Love fishing, love my job. It's a bloody shame that they clash. http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Clifftastic
Date Posted: 07 Jun 2016 at 2:03pm
We do pump from those same aquifers. Just not as many do as it is more expensive the deeper you go. With Canterbury and its braided gravels, the water is easy pickings. Up around the Manawatu, a good supply of water for a dairy farm will be 200m or more below the surface.
------------- http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: flyfisher
Date Posted: 07 Jun 2016 at 2:46pm
Snapped this wee gem at the end of the trout season just gone... yup, that green cloud is 100% pure cow ****e drifting downstream as I was casting to a big wild brown feeding on the edge... the green death came and he swam off before I could get a fly to him... paradise eh?!!...
Sadly I see this pretty much every time I'm on the river (more than most), especially in the Wairarapa district.


------------- https://www.youtube.com/user/troutboynz
|
Posted By: Lethal
Date Posted: 08 Jun 2016 at 1:14am
shame really that we cant even agree what is write or wrong,
the truth is do you want dirty streams which you can not swim in safely due to pollution,
who cares who the perpetrator is what about the water, should it be clean or dirty?
seriously its in NZ interest to be nice and Green, Tourists more so the ones which power our economy with big dollars are looking for a lovely background at every turn to extend their photo album. there is the provider to help with $$$$ to push the clean-up.
this Government needs to realize its a no brainer, this year overflow of milk has put most dairy farmers in the red, another year like this will prove its a disaster and so many will loose their farms, then what, one of our best earners with the lowest price can not support itself, while the cattle have free range given to them by our Government.
|
Posted By: Potty
Date Posted: 08 Jun 2016 at 6:29am
|
Well said Lethal, this is every kiwi's problem and needs a collaborative effort to get the outcome that is best for our country. Win-win solutions are needed, I get sick of certain groups being quick to put the boot in, less hui and more dui is needed. If your a serious fresh water angler get involved in planting and fencing projects, the goodwill will go along way when it comes to getting access to the water. Farmers have become a lot more responsible in this space, it's a changing world and we are having to adapt quickly to keep up. The majority of farmers genuinely care for the environment, and for many of us spending time on the water is our number 1 off farm activity.
------------- Love fishing, love my job. It's a bloody shame that they clash. http://www.legasea.co.nz" rel="nofollow">
|
|