Um, O.K, here goes. I certainly don't have a good grip on what's going on here but that's not at all unusual in people submitting to government proposals on fisheries management so I'm undeterred.
Also please note that the reference to commercials does not mean the little man but rather the big corparations out there that pay his wages.
My opinion is that commercial fishers should be the last in line with regard to access to fish stocks. I have no doubt that commercial fishing is the scourge of the ocean, not because they're bad people but because they're big business and big business cares not a jot for the resource and a whole lot about money. I know this because they've shown me; over and over and over again.
Certainly overall take of fish should be capped and inevitably as our population grows, rec and customary take will only increase. This increase should be allowed for by a corresponding decrease in commercial take in that species, to the point where commercial take of that species is zero if that is neccessary. Only then should restrictions be placed on overall rec and cust. take. This could be achieved through further decreasing bag limits.
Of course compensation should be paid to quota owners IF quota is property (isn't that not strictly true?) and of course if the govt holds quota that should be the first surrendered.
As for the issue of employment for fishers after quota loss, they could use their compensation to re train or seek alternative income. If the fishers are not quota holders, that's too bad. There's no such things as a job for life these days. They can blame no-one but other comm fishermen for selling out to corporations and driving the price of quota out of their reach in the first place.
Placing fair market value on quota bought out would be difficult as the fishing corparations could easily ramp the values up in the months before a buy out.
This whole patronising "comms are our friends " line so beloved by comm. allies just gives me the ****s. I think most people see through it . Comms care for nothing but money. Trying to paint a comm. as just a good kiwi bloke trying to feed his family ( a view I think most NZers would sympathise with) is farcical. The comm. wears a suit and works in an office. I do feel sorry for the fisher out there running the boat and risking his life and who is the good kiwi bloke just trying to feed his family.
Perhaps the govt could by out ( or cancel?)all quota and then lease back to these guys, making a rule that whoever holds the lease must work the boat, thereby keeping investors and speculaters out of their industry.
There you go. I'm sorry if you don't like my answers. Perhaps the corparations should've spent more money on good PR men and women. You should have them up about that.